Loren Donald Pearson

Loren Donald Pearson is a Registered Patent Attorney and a Florida Bar Board Certified Intellectual Property Attorney.  He is a partner at Assouline & Berlowe, PA and leads its intellectual property group.  Read his profile

 
  Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List iconJoin Email List  
 

Entries in PCT (2)

Thursday
Jun022011

My Theory about the Decreasing Number of Claims in Patents

European patent rules are affecting the number of claims in US patents.  That is my theory.

A widely-read blog, Patently-O, noted Decreasing Patent Claim Counts.  Their theory is, there are three primary factors that converge to explain the bulk of the decrease. (1) In 2004 the USPTO more than doubled the application fee associated with filing more than 20 claims in a single patent application. The reaction to that fee increase has now filtered through the system and most of the drop in average claim count is driven by a major reduction in the number of patents issued with more than 20 claims.  (2) In addition to increased-fees associated with a larger claim set, the USPTO appears to have ramped-up its restriction practice over this same time period – effectively causing applications to be split into two or more patents. (3) Finally, there is anecdotal evidence that the demand for patent claims has dropped based on general economic conditions and a perception that recent legal rulings have reduced the value of patent rights.

I disagree.

European patent fees are probably caused the drop in the number of claims toward 15 total claims.

European rules have significant costs for applications with more than 15 claims. This rule went into affect April 1, 2008. See EPO announcement on fees.

The timing of the European rule matches the timing of the drop in US claims.

As a result of the rule, incoming US National Phase/European Priority claim cases almost all have 15 or fewer claims.

In addition, when I write as US case that is going to be filed in Europe, the 15 claim "limit" influences my claim drafting.

European/PCT Unity of Invention standards also affect the number of claims. The unity of invention standard generally results in a more focused claim set. The result is more sister applications, each with a smaller claim set. This affects both the number of claims in incoming applications as well as well as the number of claims in US cases that will be outgoing to Europe or PCT.

A European patent attorney associate of mine, Adrian Hocking, (Adrian's email ) offers a European Patent Cost Calculator, which illustrates the effect of the number of claims on European filing costs.

Request a consultation if you are considering extending your US patent rights to Europe.  There are special considerations that significantly affect your costs.

 

Tuesday
May102011

International Patent System Marks Two Millionth Filing

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) announced the filing of the Two Millionth Patent Application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).  The PCT provides a way to preserve your international patent rights with a minimum of up-front expense.  Then, if your domestic application is approved and your business and markets grow, then you pay the expense of international patent protection later.

But today I don't want to hear about the other PCT applications.  I JUST WANT TO HEAR ABOUT YOUR ONE INVENTION that is the most important to YOU!

The PCT is a system that helps patent applicants to extend their patent rights to other countries.  The deadlines and formalities are strict.  Many foreign associates are not reliable and exceed budgets.

For outgoing international applications and national phase applications, Loren Pearson works with a flat fee to act as your outside general counsel.  As your outside general counsel, I control costs and qualify the foreign attorneys.  That means no missed deadlines and no runaway costs.

For incoming US national phase applications, I have significant experience in dealing with formalities and timing of filing.  In addition, I aggressively use strategies like the patent prosecution highway, foreign priority, and the common owner exception to minimize using substantive arguments that can lead to higher costs and patent prosecution estoppel.

Request a PCT consultation with Loren Pearson so your one big invention stands out from the other two million!